ISO 27001 vs other security frameworks
There are many ways of implementing policies, procedures and technical controls to help secure your organisation. With so many frameworks available, how do you know which one best suits your needs?
The Cyber Essentials scheme
Cyber Essentials is a UK government-backed certification scheme built around five technical controls designed to reduce exposure to common internet-based attacks. Compared with ISO 27001, it is narrower in scope and more prescriptive.
Read our blog post Cyber Essentials vs ISO 27001: Key Differences for more information.
SOC 2
SOC 2 assesses service organisations’ security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy controls against the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Trust Services Criteria.
SOC 2 reports are generally more popular in North America than Europe and are generally used for existing or prospective clients.
Read our blog post ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 Certification: What’s the Difference? for more information.
The NCSC CAF (Cyber Assessment Framework)
The NCSC CAF (Cyber Assessment Framework) is used to assess how well organisations manage cyber risks to essential functions, particularly in critical sectors and regulated environments.
Unlike ISO 27001, it is not a general-purpose certifiable management system standard for all organisations but is more closely tied to cyber resilience and assurance.
The PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard)
If you store, process or transmit payment card data, you must comply with the PCI DSS, an industry standard that sets a baseline of technical and operational requirements to protect that data.
Compared with ISO 27001, the PCI DSS is much more specific in scope: it is focused on payment card environments, whereas ISO 27001 provides a broader framework for managing information security risks across the organisation.